A Fistful of Ameros, Starring Shmuley Eastwood
This movie could have been truly magnificent if it had been a fictional account of the death of the White race. But the Jews are too smart for that, so "Our Future" rests with a Black child (probably illegitimate). Notice that the youngest person on earth is Hispanic. Notice the White woman with dreadlocks. And notice the line, "It's all over in 50 years." You don't have to watch Jew propaganda to sense the urgency of that statement. Here in the real world, Whites face extinction, and other races are doing just fine.
Generations of White women have been convinced that motherhood is oppressive and ruins their figures, but they have to find 1.3 babies somewhere. Now Gypsy women are suffering in order to fill the quota for the Soccer Moms, and the Soccer Moms are buying colored children who will be raised to believe that they are equal to the White children who are the future of our race. Feminism is suicide, and it is hardly surprising that Jews have pushed it harder than anyone else.
Made-to-order babies with genetic defects. "Three percent, or four clinics surveyed, said they have provided the costly, complicated procedure to help families create children with a disability."
The famously homogeneous Japanese are captivated by hybrid pets, which is quite ironic. Now they are surprised to discover that their inbred dogs are "born with missing paws or faces lacking eyes and a nose. There have been dogs with brain disorders so severe that they spent all day running in circles, and others with bones so frail they dissolved in their bodies… The affection for fads in Japan reflects its group-oriented culture… As the number of childless women and couples in Japan has increased, so has the number of dogs, which are being coddled and doted upon in place of children, experts say."
Nationalism is on the rise in Japan. Some Japanese know that being slaves to the Americans and being plagued by "perennial questions of identity" have produced a younger generation that doesn't love Japan - meaning not just the Japanese homeland but the Japanese people. Though the nationalists have "a shared vision: a return to pure virtues found in medieval Japan," they are also saying that "Western concepts like freedom and equality are inappropriate for Japan," which is not very surprising. As we all know, individual liberty is frowned upon in the Orient. They can be excused for not realizing that equality is not a "Western concept." Only on the Internet does the truth filter through the Jewish barricades. John Randolph of Roanoke said liberty and equality are inversely proportional, and you won't hear that from Bill O'Reilly.
"Shylocks furious at being short-weighted on their pound of flesh."
Humorless censors, bores, and frauds. Oh no! I might get sued for saying that!
Some of the greatest murderers in history. (A Jew wrote this.)
This sounds like more Jewish blackmail.
Years ago, the Pope said the Jews were not responsible for killing Christ. Since that time, many thousands of Protestant ministers who fear being called anti-Semitic above all else have spread the lie that we are all responsible for killing Christ. Rushdoony responds.
More fodder is needed for Israel. Citizenship as payment for foreign military recruits. Rome did the same thing, and Rome fell.
"E Pluribus Unum refers to the origin of the federal government in separate and independent states, not to cultures and races, something conservatives used to understand." ~ Sam Francis
"The paradox of modernity…is that however successful the understanding of time and space, the modern is less at home in the actual time and space of daily living than peoples less touched by [modern] changes… Whatever the integration of space and time in science, in modern life there is at once cultural stagnation and febrile change, a restless movement from place to place, experience to experience, revealing little evidence of a serene dwelling in the body and on the good earth." ~ Colin Gunton, The One, the Three and the Many: God, Creation and the Culture of Modernity
"Whoever keeps the fig tree will eat its fruit."
Worldly Magazine is mighty impressed by words. Little Geneva's budget is, like, $50 less than Worldly's budget, but we give you the truth here, and the truth is that Gerald Ford was a faggot. He was also a baby-killer. In fact, the Republicans have not fielded a confessedly pro-abortion nominee since Ford. Such men do not stand in the presence of the Lord. They hide in the darkness where their evil deeds may be covered, and these days there is no better place to hide than in the apostate Episcopal Church where Ford was a member. The devil is roasting him on a spit right now.
"It is safe to tell the pure in heart that they shall see God, for only the pure in heart want to." ~ C.S. Lewis
"The forgiven man is the man who makes restitution. Forgiveness is in Scripture a juridical term. It has reference to a court of law. Since restitution is in Biblical law at all times basic to forgiveness, to re-establishment into citizenship, the word forgiveness always implies restitution in Scripture. When forgiveness is separated from law and made a matter of feeling, the end result is sentimentalism. Many modern theologians and Christians insist on an unconditional forgiveness for all men, irrespective of repentance and restitution. Such a position is simply a subsidy to and an acceptance of evil as evil. It is antinomianism." ~ R.J. Rushdoony
My barber cracks me up. Sometimes I giggle so ferociously that he has trouble cutting straight and I walk out of there looking like Gene Wilder. A few days ago he was waxing mathematical about how a few home-grown Blacks are nothing to worry about, "but when enough of them get together they turn into niggers." He says he'll never go back to Orlando, which is half-Black. But his Navy Seal friend, who "ain't quite right," was held up by three Black carjackers with a gun, and he walked up to them, pointed his finger, and said, "It would be wise for you to get back in your car and drive away!" They obeyed.
One who hopes that the new president of South Africa will kill White men and enslave White women. "But as part of sorting out ungrateful white people, I want Zuma to embark on a redistribution exercise. I want him to distribute white women among the long-suffering black chaps in South Africa. He must first choose which white woman he wants. He can even have two. That done, he must then distribute to his loyal supporters. And if there is a surplus, he should distribute to his supporters in tiny neighboring states. I am one of his supporters. I look forward to the reign of President Jacob Zuma."
Well-educated Whites are more likely to be segregationists.
Hear what Rushdoony calls "insanity in the name of Christ." Seconds later, he says the United Nations is determined to transfer populations and break down nationalities in the old Assyrian and Babylonian style. This entails bringing colored people from around the globe to live here among us, with the goal of destroying us.
Rush also pointed out in the same lecture that the end of the old order in Europe was World War I. (It came a bit sooner here in the States, under Lincoln.) He said one of the primary objectives of the Freemasons (meaning Jews and other Unitarians) was to destroy the Austro-Hungarian empire, because that was the last remaining feudal system on earth. Feudalism is a form of confederate government with a very limited monarch and fiefdoms overseen by lords. In the Holy Roman Empire, there was even an electoral college to determine the emperor. How republican of them! The theocratic feudalism that was the old order was overturned by Christ-haters to be replaced by the New World Order. Many true conservatives of the 21st century are doing what they can to revive agrarian folkways. This gives them a connection, however slight, to their medieval forebears. And this is nothing new. Even states' rights were an attempt to salvage the liberty that once existed under feudalism. Totalitarianism was unknown to lords and vassals.
Rushdoony writes, "To the colonists, as to the barons who wrested Magna Carta from King John, English liberty meant feudalism in essence, localism as against centralism, contractual government as against absolutism… Each colony was a free English state under the king, and their relationship to him was feudal and contractual." Likewise for the American founding: "Limited government and constitutionalism were basic aspects of colonial faith and life, and common pulpit themes… The American political system, thus, is, first, a development of Christian feudalism." (Thanks to Jacob Aitken for these quotes. I also appreciate Jacob's description of the Southern Confederacy as "an unrefined theocracy.")
Still, we know that guarding against the excesses of feudalism was of great concern to our founding fathers, especially John Adams. John Taylor of Caroline dismissed his concerns, saying that no feudal aristocracy could arise in America because land was too plentiful. Instead, Taylor feared an aristocracy of credit and paper-money, and wisely so, for usury and national banks have been weapons of mass destruction. Taylor knew that the exploitation that existed under feudalism was as nothing compared to exploitation through inflated paper, bank stocks, and protective tariffs. He was a prophet. We know today that faith in our leaders and a sense of national integrity depend not on virtue, honor, and godliness but on Sacred Credit and force of arms. "No form of government can foster a fanaticism for wealth without being corrupted," said Taylor.
As I said, the Austro-Hungarian empire was the last remaining feudal system on earth. By 1916, the Germans, Austrians, and Ottomans had seemingly won the war against England, France, and Russia. The tide turned when Chaim Weizmann, who would become the first president of the state of Israel, struck a deal with the English. If the Zionists could drag the United States into the war, their reward would be Palestine. The deal was sweetened by the knowledge that many Jews would leave Europe as a result. Jews Weizmann, Brandeis, and Baruch convinced Woodrow Wilson to enter the war, using the Lusitania as the excuse. The Germans were depicted as bloodthirsty "Huns." The Austro-Hungarian empire collapsed, and the Balfour Declaration, giving Palestine to the Jews, was issued in November of 1917. But actually, it had been written 20 months earlier. Benjamin Freedman, a prominent Zionist, said that Wilson was blackmailed with disclosure of an extramarital affair. The states of Iraq and Kuwait were created arbitrarily by the conquerors. Iraq always considered Kuwait its southern province, which is why Saddam Hussein invaded it. (Hussein was executed today.)
Recall that Karl Marx had railed against both feudalism and capitalism. Woodrow Wilson's face was on the flip side of the New World Order's coin. Wilson and Lenin were not that different after all. Since it was Lincoln who gave Wilson his power, it is not surprising that Wilson's idea of "self-determination" did not extend to the Austro-Hungarian empire, just as Lincoln's idea of "government of the people, by the people, for the people" did not extend to the South. And when that empire fell, Europe fell with it. This explains why we don't get as worked up about Hitler as most folks these days. We know that there would have been no Hitler without American intervention in World War I, and there would have been no American intervention in World War I had it not been for Jewish interference (and more than likely, blackmail).
"The Habsburgs favoured, not an interminable bill of rights, but a clearly defined set of reciprocal duties; not the brotherhood of men, but the fatherhood of God. They knew that there has never been any such thing in human civilisation as a classless society, and that there never will be. Their religion taught them that social inequality was not something to be ashamed of, but something that God had rejoiced in ever since He preferred Abel to Cain."
It turns out that Habsburg weakness favored the Protestant Reformers, but it was their strength which erected a bulwark against Islam and created a Europe in which Christianity thrived. Could Protestants have accomplished this feat for half a millennium? As Chesterton said, "While all that we call the world was being made, they were the wall of the world."
Ravi Zacharius used to tell the story of Zita, the last Habsburg Empress. At her funeral in Vienna, her body was drawn by six black horses. The massive procession came to a stop at the Capuchin Church, where a man knocked on the closed door. A voice from within asked, “Who goes there?” Zita's titles were read aloud: “Queen of Bohemia, Dalmatia, Croatia, Slavonia, Galicia. Queen of Jerusalem, Grand Duchess of Tuscany and Krakow.” “I do not know her,” said the voice behind the door. The man knocked again, and the voice replied, “Who goes there?” “Zita, Empress of Austria and Queen of Hungary.” Again, “I do not know her.” A third time the man knocked on the door, and this time when asked, “Who goes there?” the reply was simply, “Zita, a poor sinner.” “Come in,” said the voice, and the doors were opened.
John Smith, the great pioneer of Virginia, was for a time in the service of the Habsburgs in their struggle against the Turks. William Gilmore Simms gives this account of Smith's single combat with the champion of the Turks: "So admirably true was the aim, so firm the nerves of the Christian champion, and so well-trained his steed, that the lance of Smith penetrated the beaver of the Turk, and passing through his eye into the brain, he fell dead to the ground at the first thrust, without so much as grazing the person of his conqueror. Smith leapt to the ground, unbraced the helmet of his enemy, and finding him lifeless, smote off his head, which he bore away in triumph to the Christian host." The Prince of Transylvania gave Smith a coat of arms which bore the heads of three Turks in a shield with the motto, Vincere est Vivere ("To conquer is to live"). Later, Smith struck such fear into the hearts of the Powhatan Indians of Jamestown that they denied he was mortal.
"For generations Southerners have shown an unswerving loyalty to their section, with the exception of a few today who are exhibiting the disintegrative effects of modern liberalism. They have shown this loyalty toward a region in which many outsiders can see little to be patriotic over. It is poor, comparatively, which is held to be the modern disgrace; it has preserved more than a little of the social structure of feudalism, which is supposed to be effrontery to the forces of history; it has handed down faith in a sacred literature, which is indeed anachronistic; and it has shown some reservations about the scientific interpretation of the world, which is regarded as a scandal. In a word, it has been a stumbling block to modernism." ~ Richard Weaver
Reading tips from Chris Ortiz. "Rushdoony is one of the most important Protestant thinkers since Dabney and Warfield. I would include Van Til in this lineage, but Rushdoony is just Van Til sharpened to a point… As the first president of Harvard once said, ‘you can get a world class education from a shelf of books five feet long.'"
An "awards ceremony for black kids who pass exams—while successful white classmates are ignored." Think of it as the Special Olympics.
A public school teacher who is way, way too honest. That kind of honesty can get you fired.
"Our Nation is a better place because of the contributions African Americans have made to our strength and character over the generations," said an obviously inebriated President Bush in his Kwanzaa message. Kwanzaa was concocted by the FBI. During the 1960s, the FBI encouraged the creation of groups such as Karenga's United Slaves in order to divide and discredit the Left. They encouraged rivalry between United Slaves and the Black Panthers, laughing all the while at the ridiculous jigaboos. Now the President [sic] of the United [sic] States [sic] is praising lunatics for the vibrant atmosphere of the insane asylum.
"In earlier generations Whites laughed outright at such ‘Black history' hijinks, or else mildly indulged the fantasies as one would the games of children. In fact, this attitude was so ingrained that Mark Twain sympathetically used the figure of ‘Nigger Jim' in his Huckleberry Finn to elucidate some truths in the Black idiom of fantasy so well-known at the time. Naturally, this aspect of the humorist's genius is lost on those who today seek to ban the classic - often in the same schools that take Kwanzaa seriously, and teach White children the glories of a supposedly Negroid Egypt. In the past, paternalistic Whites would often run such hustlers out of town for having ‘taken advantage of our niggers.'"
Speaking of which, Bush also praised this wife-beater for being "an American original." Can you imagine Thomas Jefferson doing any such thing?
More Negro mythology from Rushdoony. "Instead of talking about an equality of rights, why not talk about an equality of responsibility?"
Political correctness is often very comical, in a pathetic sort of way. For instance, read this, written in 1898, paying attention to the extreme content, and then notice the insertion of the words "a racist term for African Americans."
"We, the Indigenous people of this continent," harrumph, harrumph, blather, and snort. I'm surprised that it took them five whole sentences to get to the word "Hitler."
Jane Elliott and her blue-eyed devil children.
Cousin marriage undermines democracy? Sounds wonderful.
"Of course, non-Indians have no idea how important being Indian is to Indians. That's a given. Other races couldn't care less about their own race. Racial denigration is common, especially among liberal whites, who are out to destroy all racial distinction, as their Communist godfather Marx intended. But it won't work with Indians." ~ David Yeagley
"Tracy Brown said his six children have been able to relate better to church because of gospel crunk, and it has given them a positive outlook… ‘I can get the message a whole lot better because it has an urban feel to it.'"
Congratulations are in order to Lie-gonier Ministries and the Bible Answer Man organization. Tim Dick, RC Sproul, and Hank Hanegraaff have made the list of the six most abusive ministries. I just had a thought. If everyone at Lie-gonier works extra hard at spreading the "gospel" in the coming year, the RC Sproul family salary could surpass the Paul Crouch family salary! Let this be a lesson to you that the Holy Spirit can make you rich.
"But now I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or swindler - not even to eat with such a one." ~ 1 Cor 5:11
"What then is my reward? That in my preaching I may present the gospel free of charge, so as not to make full use of my right in the gospel." ~ 1 Cor 9:18
A picture of the RC Sproul Jr "family." As they sing on Sesame Street, one of these things is not like the others.
Emergent wacko Brian McLaren visits fag churches.
Children, Pastor Ted made a mistake and now he is spending some quiet time with Jesus.
Amy Grant and the pornikon euaggelion.
Matt Chancey has bet the farm that Jennifer Epstein is responsible for the Ministry Watchman site. His research into the MW masthead photo is quite amazing, and quite wrong. But I have a theory of my own to float, and here it is in a nutshell: "Matt Chancey" is actually Jennifer Epstein. I arrived at this conclusion when I saw that the Mrs. Binoculars site has pushed Jennifer Epstein's blog into the Top 100 of 544,199 Wordpress blogs. It's quite obvious that this is a case of shameless self-promotion. Since then, I have documented my exhaustive research in a 200-page, meticulously-footnoted thesis which will be published next month, complete with full-color graphics and pie charts. All the best people have written endorsements on the back cover, and this week the morning talk shows were notified. This is going to be big, folks!
Rick Warren tithes 90%. I remember hearing D. James Kennedy say that he tithes 125% of his salary. Some people are quite impressed by this, but the fact is that the remaining funds are substantial for these men. That was the whole point of Jesus making an example of the widow's mite. Today's megachurch pastor has much in common with the Pharisees, who never failed to make spectacles of themselves.
I wonder if Doug Phillips would advise Rick Warren to sue his many detractors, such as Ingrid Schlueter and Joseph Farah. I don't know if Warren would be popular in the Fraternal Order of Litigious Christians, but he does have nice facial hair.
Very serious allegations from Ministry Watchman against the brother of Doug Phillips: "From all accounts, at a minimum hundreds of Christians died as a direct result of Brad Phillips' theft and premature release of Sudan, the Hidden Holocaust… Interestingly enough though, Persecution Project no longer sells its stolen version of the video (sounds a lot like the disappearance of Raising The Allosaur, doesn't it?)… Brad Phillips built his ‘ministry' and gained a name for himself on the backs of honorable men that he ripped off… It appears as if film fraud is a Phillips family tradition. But Doug Phillips at least comes out looking not quite as bad as his little brother in that hundreds of Christians haven't died because of his video fraud."
Christians are on the run in the Middle East because Judeochristians in America have ruined their lives.
Jobs that Whites won't do are suddenly filled by White people when laws against wetbacks are enforced. Funny how that works.
Two million homeowners are facing foreclosure.
This is the year that you get a tax refund on the Spanish-American War. Where would we be without good, paternalistic government?
"They said this issue wouldn't resignate with the people. They've been proved wrong, it does resignate." ~ George W. Bush
Masonic pictures here and here.
Rural Virginia is being paved, and the blast zone widens.
December 30th, 2006 at 7:16 pm
In that movie, I'll bet the woman's baby comes out looking like this:
Or like Jew Phil Spector:
December 30th, 2006 at 7:58 pm
Harry, I just think you are jealous of my numbers and by linking to my blog, you think you might increase your own readership!
I thought I must be superwoman after reading Matt's analysis of how I spend my time, but that's nothing compared to what you're attributing to me now! Can you just imagine how many hours of work Matt Chancey put into his wild conjecturing? Yes, I now run my old blog, my new blog, Ministry Watchman, and MrsBinoculars, all of which put out frequent, LENGTHY articles. I am so good I amaze myself! Oh, yes, I almost forgot all the comments I leave all over the web as well.
Love the Don King pic!
December 30th, 2006 at 9:48 pm
I would laugh when Christ-hating Jews tell Christians how to behave. But the terrible truth is most Christians will obey the very Christ-haters who want only their destruction.
Imagine what would happen if some notable Christian were to say something like, “Jews would do well to consider what Christian scholars have been saying about the so-called Holocaust. Jews should address questions about the supposed six million Jews killed during the so-called Holocaust, the number that has been cited repeatedly and without question since the 1940's. Jews should explain why the six million number is still cited even though the number of dead on the plaque at the Auschwitz camp has been revised from four million to 1.5 million - a decrease of 2.5 million. Fair-minded and decent Jews should press their leaders to cease their non-stop efforts to criminalize any dissent from the Zionist view of history. Jews should encourage and welcome all independent research into the so-called “Holocaust”. Jews should apologize for the Jew-led revolutions and movements that have resulted in the deaths of tens of millions or possibly hundreds of millions of innocent people. Jews should accept their responsibility for fostering centuries of ill-will between themselves and almost every other race, ethnicity, culture, and religion.” Such a statement could go on for many paragraphs and pages. Naturally, the Jew reaction would be rabid and violent. They would resent bitterly the notion that any goy should dare tell them how to behave. And yet, rarely do three days pass that some Jew doesn't take to print or the airwaves to tell Christians how to go about committing suicide.
December 30th, 2006 at 10:29 pm
Yes, in the previous thread, Mateusz calls us “stupid” for not recognizing that “billions” of Jews disappeared from Europe as well as “one billion of Poles.” We're “stupid” for not trusting these wildly inflated numbers that are fabricated from nothing more than emotion. (The total population of Poland was about 30 million in 1940.) Meanwhile, what do men like Mateusz have to say about thought-criminals such as David Irving? What do all these Jews pretending to be White nationalists have to say about men who are imprisoned for disagreeing with Jews? To hell with them and their lies.
December 31st, 2006 at 12:33 am
From one web site carrying news of the Japanese pet fetish, I saw this:
In the future successful society, breeding people will be as openly purposeful as pet breeding today. The optimum family size, for the successful, will be three-two of one gender and a third of another. The popular thing will be for couples to have two of their own and a third by a famous scientist or other genius. This also would facilitate the gender goal, as in the future it will be easy to sort sperm for boy or girl tadpoles, zapping the unwanted ones with nano-tech lasers or beams perhaps.
Also birthing itself will become a more purposeful activity. Home birth will be the standard with rituals and preparations accordingly stylized. Women will be routinely tested for ability to safely birth naturally and those likely to need surgery will often choose childfreness or adoption.
In this manner eugenesis and fashion will coincide, which is why i say “the successful society will”.
December 31st, 2006 at 1:00 am
And I'm sure he would say we're “stupid” because we refuse to acknowledge the “truth” behind fraudulent “Holocaust memiors” such as _The Painted Bird_ by Jerzy Kosinski and _Fragments_ by Binjamin Wilkomirski. To folks like Mateusz and his deluded ilk, we're not only “stupid” for not believing such hoaxes, but we're “racist” and “anti-semitic” for reminding people that those books are frauds, and for inferring that since those Jews have lied about the Holohoax, then it's very likely that other Jews have lied about the Holohoax.
I guess we're supposed to immediately press the “I Believe” button when we are faced with the lies of the likes of Kosinski and Wilkomirski, and we're supposed to reject out of hand the truths of men like David Irving and Ernst Zundel. Those crazy Jews have some funny ways.
December 31st, 2006 at 5:24 am
WOW,
After reading the post about Jane Elliott I now realize she is the cause of my “racism” I went through a “role-playing exercise” just like hers in second or third grade. I had the job of teasing the other children, received special treats, and played games, while the others had to sit on the floor and face the wall. It was at that moment in my life I came to the understanding that I truly was better than all those losers.
December 31st, 2006 at 9:19 am
It's nothing for a Rev Kennedy to tithe back their modest salary (but why boast about it?), because it doesn't include housing or travel allowances — which the rest of us pay out of pocket. The pastors of the mega-churches make their real money by selling books and tapes of their sermons, the proceeds of which they keep — even though the congreation paid for the recording and TV studios.
This past fall Coral Ridge promised large raises to their underpaid teachers, then reneged the week that school began (taking advantage of some small print in the teacher contracts.) With enrollment plummeting, and attendance down, the money losing TV show must go on.
Paradoxically, within the school they promote miscegenation, while parents pay $10,000/year to keep their children out of the minority dominated Ft lauderdale public schools.
A few years ago, I considered becoming a Presbyterian, but hanging around Coral Ridge changed my mind.
December 31st, 2006 at 10:46 am
The last time I was in Kennedy's bookstore, I saw a lot of Lincoln and Harriet Tubman materials. He's probably never confronted about it because his church is filled with Yankees.
I think a lot of people are in your boat. They would become presbyterian or episcopalian if not for the fact that those churches are actively seeking our destruction - all in the name of love, of course.
December 31st, 2006 at 11:28 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZG9SxchaqNY
Watch all four of these short David Cole videos on Auschwitz. (David Cole is a Jew!) What were Germans thinking by building a swimming pool for the inmates? Did the Jews sip pina coladas before being shuttled off to the gas/steam/electro chambers? Couldn't the brilliant German engineers have devised more efficient means of genocide?
Cole also addresses the “4 million” lie mentioned by Winston that came from trusting Soviet propaganda for 40 years.
December 31st, 2006 at 1:08 pm
Forgive my randomness;but where have all the Crowells gone ?
“Come out from the house of bondage, fight for freedom, fight for manhood, fight for the coming day when in body, soul and spirit you will be free to live your own lives, and give glory to your Creator.” -Oliver Cromwell
Oh white race of little faith ! -sighs-
December 31st, 2006 at 1:09 pm
*Cromwells even {my apologies for the typo}
December 31st, 2006 at 2:43 pm
I didn't know that Kennedy had a heart attack last week:
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/broward/sfl-ckennedy31dec31,0,5486958.story?coll=sfla-news-broward
December 31st, 2006 at 2:58 pm
Another bunch of cowards, in Texas, of all places:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/EDUCATION/12/28/confederate.statues.ap/index.html
December 31st, 2006 at 2:59 pm
Speaking of the Austro-Hungarian empire, some may be interested in a review of a book about its last emperor:
A Heart for Europe
It ends with this quote from the British historian A. L. Rowse, “This filthy twentieth century. I hate its guts.”
December 31st, 2006 at 4:24 pm
I wish I had said it first!
December 31st, 2006 at 4:25 pm
Regarding your picture of the White Race tombstone, a related article on this subject:
http://whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=2119
Excerpt: “They called themselves The Greatest Generation.”
Only with this last, ultimate overreaching did it begin to become clear just what a sick mentality, just what a spoiled-child mentality, this generation had. When the WWII Generation took over, the white man strode the earth like a Colossus. By the time these moronic cowards finally are going to their graves and whatever awaits them thereafter, white men apologize for their very existence, and champion its end.
Full article at the link above.
December 31st, 2006 at 4:36 pm
Right, the “Greatest Generation” nonsense is a Jewish fable. The two world wars claimed, I'm sure, over 100 million lives. We've been in decline ever since, and our damn fool leaders are still fighting wars for Israel.
By the way, I set up that blog for Bob. That's why it looks so much like LG.
December 31st, 2006 at 4:46 pm
By the way, Empress Zita's funeral was in 1989. Not that long ago. Here's a well-written account of the funeral procession:
The six-horse funeral car, huge, baroque and black, drove through the city centre to the Capuchin Church, and the Chamberlain hammered on the door. From inside, a monk answered:
Wer ist da? Who is there?
The Chamberlain reeled off the titles of the deceased: “Empress of Austria, Apostolic Queen of Hungary, Princess of Bohemia, Grand Duchess of Lodomeria, etc., etc.”
Ich kenne sie nicht! I know you not!
Then the recitation again.
And again Ich kenne sie nicht!
Finally the Chamberlain hammered for the third time.
Wer ist da?
Ein armer und sündiger Mensch. A poor and sinful creature.
And the great door opened.
This ceremony was deeply moving, perhaps because it took place in an otherwise modern city, the funeral car making its way past newsstands, McDonalds, and parked motors. Also because it seemed to come from a deep level of the European past, a ritual being carried out by retainers indifferent to any present-day notions of popularity or image-projection.
It was moving in a way that the funeral of Diana, Princess of Wales, a decade later, was not. The latter event was a raw, emotional shriek of betrayal by the losers in an ambiguously United Kingdom: the archetypal mourner seemed a 45-year old single mum hung out to dry by the Child Support Agency, whose dignity and income benefited as little from the People's Princess as it would from New Labour. The magic of the Habsburg ritual was the same as Shakespeare's laconic dirge in Cymbeline:
Fear no more the heat of the sun,
Nor the wild winter's rages:
Thou thy worldly task hath done,
Home art gone, and ta'en thy wages.
…
Golden lads and lasses must,
Like chimney-sweepers, come to dust.
It was unifying, dignifying and curiously egalitarian. You could see why the Holy Roman Empire had held out for centuries.
December 31st, 2006 at 5:53 pm
DAMN! This is the greatest website in the world!
December 31st, 2006 at 6:52 pm
Re: The Blue Eyes/Brown Eyes brainwashing exercise.
My teaching credential program required all its students to participate in this brainwashing exercise as a part of one class. At the time I was not (very) racially aware (on the verge, but not there yet), but still found it a disturbing manipulation of the students.
If anything was designed to create a generation of bleeding heart liberal teachers, this certainly was.
Yech.
Laurel
December 31st, 2006 at 8:34 pm
I agree with Winston.
There's nothing like sticking it to the Jews and their new world order. And no one does it better than Little Geneva.
January 1st, 2007 at 2:47 am
What is this place? You make some good points, but then you make collectivist comments about Jews.
I have read the Institutes of Biblical Laws (the first volume–I'm now on the 2nd one). Rushdoony specifically points out that race is not the determining factor for the covenant people. In fact, according to him that is the mistake Israel makes.
I know that he was against interracial marriage. But, I didn't discern anything in these books to suggest that he thought that people of other races were collectively and inherently inferior.
Are the proprietors of this site collectivists?
January 1st, 2007 at 10:02 am
LOL!!! Don't y'all mean ‘Jew world Order'?
Speakin' of jews, does anyone have reliable figures for the numbers of ‘em killed in Tsarist-era pogroms, esp. in the late 19th Century that might have fed the bloodthirsty revenge taken by the Cheka under Lenin & Stalin?
January 1st, 2007 at 10:49 am
JW, we're too busy speaking the truth to worry about whether it's collectivist. We agree with Rushdoony (and the Bible) that we are saved by grace rather than race.
January 1st, 2007 at 11:52 am
“What is this place? You make some good points, but then you make collectivist comments about Jews.”
Think of the recent Advent season scripture readings, “We are the voice of one crying in the desert- prepare ye the way of the Lord.”
One sometimes gets the feeling that this is what we are doing, for merely holding to a reality such as a) your family is worth propagating, and that b)racial awareness (cultural awareness for the linguistically squeamish) is a good thing, when the vast majority around you are like Matrix clones in the ‘multiculturalism is a good thing' mantra mindset.
Thanks for the amazing diversity (oh, that word!) of news items in this last post. By the way, my family crest (clan in Scotland) has either three Negroes or three Moors cut at the throat, with blood dripping from them. When I first saw that, I KNEW I cam from a noble race of Men, and not miscegenated wimps. A case of ‘they being dead, yet speaketh' to this lone son of the Gordon clan…(Even though the local [sic] Scottish Clan President foamed at the mouth for my very minor, subtle notion that membership in the Coalition be restricted to those of only Celtic racial makeup….
January 1st, 2007 at 1:03 pm
Funniest photo caption on the McLaren website: “Baptism and Pool Party, June 18, 2006″.
…and a quote from the depraved queer “Pastor” Randy:
“As I remember, he (God) resembled Santa Claus quite a bit - a kind elderly gentleman with a long white beard and eyes that twinkled. I approached the throne and offered my tray up to Him. That was my concept of being God's servant.”
Dandy Randy talks all about his boyfriend, and AIDS, and churches, and “god”, but nowhere does he mention Jesus Christ.
Thank God I am a Christian Kinist.
January 1st, 2007 at 2:01 pm
Regarding post #24
How many yids were killed in the Tsars pogroms?
Six million, each time.
Simple, is it not?
January 1st, 2007 at 2:29 pm
Need for clarification HLS.
I saw that you printed an explanation of the US motto, “E pluribi Unum” as depicting the federalism of the United States. In many a post on other places I make this into a matter of why the US is a place of race-mixing.
A majority of the elite of America were Masons. One of the key tenets of Masonry IS the “Universal Brotherhood of Man”. I heard this from a Mason when I was young and had no discernment or wisdom. Masonry even though it discriminated against blacks in America was a race-mixing theory in Europe. (Am I right here?)
Could you see “E pluribi Unum” as almost a double entendre with an outward meaning and then a secret inner meaning. Many Enlightment writers living in a majority Catholic environment took to dissimiltude to move their agenda in an hostile environment.
I believe “E pluribe Unum” has dual meanings! One in the open and “politically correct” and another secret meaning. I believe it is of Masonic meaning!
January 1st, 2007 at 2:36 pm
There is NO such thing as the “White” race.
Here I am on a “Protestant” “Sola Scriptura” site and I find that “Prots” don't use the Scriptural definition of race but of the Materialist description!!!
I find this strange and inconsistent.
God seperated the people on earth BY LANGUAGE but “White” is not a language but a colorless bland color!!! Why not say “Here lies the Indo-European Race, a bunch of cowards”? God created the races through Language NOT BY COLOR!!!
Again, to make another point—-To describe things in a Materialist viewpoint is not Christian!!! Christianity is a METAPHYSICAL religion and we use Metaphysics to describe the world. Man is Soul!!!! And language is the operation of Soul!!! Therefore Language defines Race and NOT color of skin.
There is NO SUCH THING AS THE WHITE RACE OR WHITE NATIONALISM!!!! I am an Indo-European, of the Tribe of the Hellenes, of the Tribe of the Dorians. I AM NOT F_ {edited by admin} WHITE you stupid ignorant Americans!
January 1st, 2007 at 3:17 pm
You are so weird, Lindsay, but funny, in a weird sort of way.
Don't drop the f-bomb here again unless you want to be banned. We WHITE men try to keep it clean around the ladies.
January 1st, 2007 at 3:53 pm
I was hoping you would graciously censor it for me. :))) Thanks. I try not to slip again.
January 1st, 2007 at 4:02 pm
“There is NO such thing as the “White” race.”
Wheeler, Wheeler, Wheeler. . .Stanford University disagress with you.
“The study is by far the largest, consisting of 3,636 people who all identified themselves as either white, African-American, East Asian or Hispanic. Of these, only five individuals had DNA that matched an ethnic group different than the box they checked at the beginning of the study. That's an error rate of 0.14 percent.”
Did Stanford say people correctly identified themselves as “White”? Hey! They surely did! But then, Stanford _would_ say it, since they've identified uniquely White DNA. Stanford is one of those places that is hardly sympathetic to White people. If they could do away with White people by simply saying, “The White race doesn't exist,” they'd do so.
Read the whole thing here:
http://mednews.stanford.edu/releases/2005/january/racial-data.htm
Wheeler, please check into re-hab. Your many years of smoking banana peels and shooting up shoe polish is taking its toll on your mind, and it shows in increasingly higher relief every time you put mucous-encrusted finger to keyboard.
By the way, Wheeler: do you see any good that could come from wide-spread miscegenation? Are you one of those fools who encourage miscegenation? Just curious.
January 1st, 2007 at 4:54 pm
Mr. Wheeler, a question if I may. If language, as you say, is the uniquely defining characteristic of a race, does a person change his race when he loses his original language? As a hypothetical example, colonial America had large numbers of Germans. When a German couple have a German child in an Anglo land, and the child learns to speak English and not German, does he thereby become an Englishman? I believe the French operated on precisely this hypothesis, believing that French language and culture would make French men out of Africans. See modern France for the result. Race is rooted far deeper than even language.
January 1st, 2007 at 4:59 pm
First, Winston Smith, you let ungodly men teach you?
It says “Blessed is the man who has not walked in the council of sinners, and has not stood in the way of sinners, and has NOT sat in the seat of evil men”.
America itself is a race-mixing country. There is Anglo-Saxon Race. Is that to be mixed with the Celtic Race. Or the Race of the Gauls? Should the Germanic Tribes be mixed with the Dutch? Should the Hellenic Races be mixed with the Italic Race?
Europe is NOT a Race!!! Europe is composed of thirty or more Races!!! Should the Doric Race be mixed with the Ionian Race? Should the Welsh Race be mixed with the Scottish Race?
Our skin color may all be white BUT WHITE does not tell the difference between Scotsmen or Saxons and these are TWO DIFFERENT RACES.
It is you my friend that is in error! It is you that is for miscegnation!!! Miscegenation between the Celtic and the Saxon IS JUST AS WRONG BETWEEEN the Saxon and the Negroe!!!
Frenchmen are not to marry Germans nor Scots with Scandanavian people! Should Finish people marry Spanish people? NO.
Your use of “DNA” is an argument from a MATERIALIST philosophy the same philosophy that guides Communism and Fascism!
Materialism is not a Christian philosophy! I don't follow the ways of the ungodly but of the Truth.
TO SAY “White” is to promote miscegenation among the Indo-European people. America IS NOT A COUNTRY OR A NATION. America is a piece of (but use your imagination). Every country in Europe is Organic. America is a Plastic Man-made country!! America is Inorganic. America is false construct! America is to be condemned!!!
Every person here needs to return BACH TO HIS Natural European descent. If you are such a Heinz57, pick one group and stick to it. Have racial solidarity with ONE European Tribe!
America is NOT a Nation! America is an abomination before the eyes of God!
January 1st, 2007 at 5:35 pm
“E pluribi Unum” “E pluribe Unum”
First, Ms. Wheeler, the correct spelling:
E Pluribus Unum.
Then, the definition:
The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition. 2002.
E pluribus unum
(EE PLOOR-uh-buhs YOOH-nuhm, OOH-nuhm) A motto of the United States; Latin for “Out of many, one.” It refers to the Union formed by the separate states. E pluribus unum was adopted as a national motto in 1776 and is now found on the Great Seal of the United States and on United States currency. 1
The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition. Edited by E.D. Hirsch, Jr., Joseph F. Kett, and James Trefil. Copyright © 2002 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Please spell and define your terms correctly.
God bless,
Laurel
January 1st, 2007 at 6:25 pm
Here are the Races of the Japhetic Race:
Saxons
Angles
Normans
Celts
Gauls
Hellenes, Ionians Dorians, Acheans
Germanic Tribes
Dutch
Danes
Swedes
Finish
Welsh
Scotsmen
Basque
Iberian
And then you have the Slavic, Hungarian that includes the Poles.
A Heinz 57 IS NOT a race or a Nation!!! A Nation or Race means COMMON DESCENT delinated by language! Well, a Heinz 57 is an abomination like anything else!
January 1st, 2007 at 6:39 pm
America, the Land of Heinz 57's!
——————–
But Laurel, what is the motto of God?
“And all men are from the ground, and Adam was created of earth. In much knowledge the Lord hath divided them, and made their ways diverse.” LXX Book of Sirach, Ecclesiasticus, 36.10f.
Here is the Motto of God, “E Unum, pluribi”—”Out of One, Many”. Jesus with a few loaves and fishes, Made Many.
God's Motto is “Out of One, Many”
Out of One Patriarch Abraham, Many Nations!
Out of One Mother Rebecca, were twins. Out of One Father, Jacob, Twelve Tribes.
Out of One, Many is the Motto of God.
And what does Nature teach?
Out of One Fertilized Cell, Many Cells are Made.
What America does is stand the Motto of God on its head, and reverses what God has ordained. Out of One, Many. Even the site “Christians against Tyranny” point out the NWO character of America. America is the NWO in miniature. America is about taking all the races and making them “American”—NOT SO.
Americanism is a Heresy that needs to be condemned along with Nestorianism and Arianism. America is NOT a nation nor a “race” unless you think a Heinz 57 is a race!
January 1st, 2007 at 6:57 pm
Carolina Man Says:
January 1st, 2007 at 4:54 pm
Mr. Wheeler, a question if I may. If language, as you say, is the uniquely defining characteristic of a race, does a person change his race when he loses his original language? As a hypothetical example, colonial America had large numbers of Germans. When a German couple have a German child in an Anglo land, and the child learns to speak English and not German, does he thereby become an Englishman? I believe the French operated on precisely this hypothesis, believing that French language and culture would make French men out of Africans. See modern France for the result. Race is rooted far deeper than even language.
Good question. I can't answer this right now, I have to meditate on this. But let me add fuel to the fire: Isocrates said, “He who speaks Greek, is Greek”. But then Isocrates was a promulgator of “cosmopolitianism” which is the NWO.
Alexander the Great, as a Tyrant and Easternized, began to think himself a god. He also wanted to meld the Persian and Greek together.
One day he stood up before both armies, Persian and Greek. He commanded all to kneel to him as a God. The Persians Knelt but the Greeks remained standing.
Can you really meld these two cultures/races together?
If a Frenchman can take Germans in and make them French, can French take in Jews and make them French as well?
Do not the Blessings and the Curses in the Bible follow in the line of the Children? Are the blessings and the curses in the Bible attached to the Soul?
Is there not a Gallic Soul? A Germanic Soul? An Ionian Soul? An Anglo-Saxon soul?
Here is something to consider, The Pelopenessian War was first called the Doric War because it was considered, by the ancient Greeks, a Racial war between the Ionians and the Doric Greeks. That is why Athens sailed to the Island of Melos and destroyed the Doric colony there. Syracuse was a Doric Colony and Athens attacked this as well.
The German Classicist, Karl Otfried Muller, points out in his 1839 book, the glaring racial differences between the Ionians and the Doric Greeks. Yet, they were both Hellenic, they were a far different people!
The Greeks were far different from the Romans! Cato excoriated his countrymen and saw the danger the Greeks posed for Romans; in a sense he is right!
J. Salwyn Schapiro wrote a book called “Liberalism and the Challenge of Fascism, Social Forces in England and France, (1815-1870)”. In it, he constrasts the differences between England and France and the only thing that answers that is the racial differences between the French and the English.
Furthermore, A.H.J. Greenidge, M.A., in A Handbook of Greek Constitutional History, writes that Sparta and Britain had the same form of government: “History has shown that such forms of government (speaking about mixed government) are suited to a commonsense non-idealistic people: the Phoenicians of Carthage, the Dorians of Greece, Romans, and Englishmen have all developed this type of polity” (pg 76); “Besides acknowledged difficulty of the creation of such a system,…so amply illustrated by the history of Sparta, Rome, and England” (ibid).
The Races are very different. The English Race is very different from the French Race! Let me get back to you.
January 1st, 2007 at 7:12 pm
If God didn't create the various races of men, who did?
January 1st, 2007 at 7:32 pm
Sorry, Ms. Wheeler (or Mr., however, the character and tone of your writing leads me to believe you are female). Even with turning around the order of the words of the motto, it means the same thing. In order to get the “out of one, many” idea across that you obviously wish to, you would have to use one of the following two phrases:
1. Ex uno plura (with the original neuter adjective)
2. Ex uno plures [nationes]
I studied Latin in my younger years, and while I am not a scholar of the language, I know enough to know when someone is wrong, and to look up the correct usage, which, if you would like to know its background, is available at http://serendipity.lascribe.net/ling-lang/2005/07/unus-solus-totus-ullus/
However, if you are just going to substitute the correct version of the phrase in a harangue, please don't bother.
God bless,
Laurel
January 1st, 2007 at 8:56 pm
Wheeler, Wheeler, Wheeler . . .you get weirder by the word. . .
No, I do not let ungodly men teach. But, just because ungodly people stumble upon and admit what humans have known for thousands of years does not make that knowledge ungodly or unuseable. We sin when we allow the enemies of Christ to co-opt knowledge, because they will inevitably use that knowledge in their war against God and His people. In fact, when the ungodly make pronouncements, especially scientific pronouncements as the Stanford people did, Godly men are duty-bound to examine those pronouncements so that we might redeem whatever truth upon which they might stumble by God's Grace. I think it's very efficient (and very satisfying) for us to allow the ungodly to spend millions of dollars and lots of time doing their research and arriving at knowledge so that we might use it to God's glory, because 1) “the wealth of the sinner is laid up for the just,” (Proverbs 13:22), and 2) “The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth His handiwork. Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge. There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.” (Psalm 19:1-3) Godly men have no fear whatsoever of any scientific research. God invented science, and all true science points us right back to Him. The ungodly triumph in knowledge only when invertebrates like you, who call themselves Christians, tremble in fear and run for their favorite sandy head-hole whenever some Christ-hating “scientist” broadcasts his latest “discovery.” Knowledge is the Christian's domain, you coward. Paul had no problem at all using knowledge that had been acquired by the ungodly: “[A]s certain also of YOUR OWN POETS have said, For we are also his offspring.” Paul didn't fear what the ungodly had learned, and neither should we.
I'm glad the Stanford people did the research into race identification. They now understand what we Kinists have understood and been saying for years. Their conclusion is confirmed by God's Word. Only cowards like you will fail to take advantage of the work they did.
Your claims about materialism are nothing more than the old Gnostic heresy, which the Apostle John condemned. You despise the material world, the very material world that God created. God created DNA, you half-wit. (I'm being generous in assigning the proportion of your wit, but work with me here.) Tell you what: why don't you put your disdain for the material world into action by not eating for a couple of months. My guess is that the end of that time, when the emergency room doctor tells you that you're starving, you won't say, “That's materialism! A scientist has taught you that we need food! Materialism is the basis for Socialism and Fascism! I will NOT be taught by a materialistic scientist!”
So, you reject Socialism, but you embrace the Gnostic heresy. You're a complicated guy. Well, you're not really complicated. You're just a fool.
Angles, Saxons, Franks, Nordics, etc. marry and breed because they look alike, and they see no problem with marrying someone who looks like them and having babies that look like them. All those people correctly identify their own White race. They would have correctly identified their race in the Stanford experiment, too. That's why we still have White people, you cerebral flat-liner.
I'm a miscegenist, eh? Funny. . .my White wife and my White children are as White as I am. But then, you're a Gnostic, so no claim you make is too outlandish. And you haven't answered my questions about whether or not you see any good in miscegenation and if you'd encourage it. Get to it, boy. Answer my questions.
My gosh, Wheeler. You're the biggest idiot I've seen here since the days when John Totten used to make a fool of himself every time he logged on.
Maybe your idiocy can be explained by your rejection of science. Genetics is a science, but since you reject science as materialism, you reject the basic genetic laws of inbreeding. You're inbreeding has made you a retard.
January 1st, 2007 at 9:12 pm
Laurel, thanks for correcting me. I had only one semester in Latin and I have been trying to find somebody that could reverse the phrase for me.
Thank you very much! I will start to use it.
January 1st, 2007 at 9:38 pm
Nowhere did I say that I hated the material earthly created world. Nowhere.
Here is the Oxford English dictionary meaning of Materialism: 1 a tendency to consider material possessions and physical comfort as more important than spiritual values.
2 Philosophy the theory or belief that nothing exists except matter and its movements and modifications
Materialism as a Sophistry built on the Enlightenment is the replacing the explaination of the world from the Spiritual to only the Material viewpoint.
Plato said, “All things that have self-movement have souls”. Soul is not a material thing. It has NOTHING TO DO with DNA. Materialism is the explaining of everything through matter.
Well, the Greeks did not do that. In a modern materialistic age, the ancient Greek mentality is greatly overlooked. Aristotle writes that difference is of a spiritual (metaphysical) nature: “…slaves have bodies of freemen and freemen the souls only.” Politics, Bk I ii 14; 1254b 34; Loeb pg 23. The difference resides in the soul one possesses.
Freemen possess the soul of Freemen but not the body. The Human Body consists of BODY AND SOUL. What you do Mr. Winston is devolve the Human body down to just DNA, to matter and you disregard the Soul.
The blessings and the Curses of the Bible exist in the S O U L and NOT in the DNA!
When the Angel of the Lord appeared unto Hagar in the Desert the Angel relayed what was going to be of Ishmael. He said, “He will be a wild man. His hand will be against all, and all against him”.
What is this? The spirit of Antagonism. This is NOT DNA!!! but a mark on the Soul. This spirit of Antagonism is passed from one generation to the next! This is done by Soul.
DNA is fine but it is only a small part. From ONE man, Adam, God made many nations of the earth. The Scriptures teach that GOD confused the language. Language is the operation of S O U L. God changed the souls of men—-As their souls changed so did their bodies.
When Rebecca had the twins, God said, “And the Lord said to her, There are two nations in thy womb and two peoples shall be separated from thy belly, and one people shall excel the other, and the elder shall serve the younger”
Twins from the Same womb–but very different. One God ordered to excel and the other to commonness! God differentiated their souls! And as their soul was differentiated it manifested itself to their physical differences as well. Essau was hairy!
Differences of the Races is one of DNA but even of greater magnitude is the Soul. It is the Soul that carries the personality—-NOT THE BODY.
January 1st, 2007 at 9:50 pm
The curse of Adam, of why we die, is a mark on our SOUL, not in our DNA! Who is an orthodox Christian here! If everything is DNA then how is the Curse of Adam passed on.
This is the necessity of Baptism is the purifying of the Soul through regeneration! The Body dies but the Soul rises or descends to its proper place! Where is your Christian theology, Man?
There is a principle of Doric philosophy of Harmony. Because the Soul of man is damaged, the body is also damaged. Notice how small sections of our bodies are out of proportion, like one of my shoulders is longer than the other. One thing is the mirror of the other. But don't mistake the secondary cause for the primary cause. SOUL is the primary cause and the body is secondary! Did not Jesus point out the difference! Soul is more important than Body!
But Christians take the Spiritual explanation as primary and more excellent than a materialist answer. A physical fact only supports the Spiritual Truth.
Races were created by God! And as He changed the language, He changed the souls of those individuals.
There is such a thing as National Character, because there is a National Soul! The Christian teaching is that God created the races by changing the language. It says, “In much knowledge the Lord hath divided them, and made their ways diverse.” He made their ways diverse. He changed the souls of them and their bodies followed the changes of the Souls! Diversity first resides in the Soul and then the Body.
DNA does not take precedence over Soul but DNA should support Soul. Soul is the first thing, DNA second.
Soul.
January 1st, 2007 at 9:58 pm
!!!!!Furthermore!!!! Abraham cursed Ham's children with slavery; to be enslaved!
Does this curse operate under DNA or a spiritual cause and is attached to the Soul?
Mr. Winston, please go through the mechanics on how this operates and how this is passed through all the generations of Ham! How does DNA do it?
It doesn't. Mr. Winston, you are a materialist like the National Socialists!
The curse of Ham falls on the sons as a Mark on the Soul! All the Hamatic Races have this permanent Mark!
January 1st, 2007 at 10:34 pm
That Wheeler chick certainly likes to use those exclamation points, doesn't she?
Yes, she does!
January 1st, 2007 at 11:49 pm
Scorebored!
Here! are! some! extra! exclamation! points! she! left! lying! around!!!!!!
And I think she has not yet looked up the meaning of harangue on http://onelook.com.
LOL,
Laurel
January 1st, 2007 at 11:58 pm
An a helpful note, onelook.com is the most awesome dictionary search engine. They have 931 different dictionaries indexed, including some old (Webster's 1831) and esoteric technical or medical ones.
If you can't find the word on Onelook,chances are you will have to give up that Scrabble point.
God bless,
Laurel
January 2nd, 2007 at 10:23 am
“Jews should explain why the six million number is still cited even though the number of dead on the plaque at the Auschwitz camp has been revised from four million to 1.5 million - a decrease of 2.5 million.”
It's really not relevant. The figure of 5 to 5.5 million dead Jews (which we get from Jews Hilberg and Bauer) is based not on any records or physical evidence of the number of dead at various camps or other locations; it is based on demographic analyses. The demographic analyses, of course, are subject to challenge on a number of grounds, a lot of which will be found in Sanning's “Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry”.
January 2nd, 2007 at 10:34 am
I think the Rushdoony quote on Magna Carta comes from the first two chapters of *This Independent Republic*
January 2nd, 2007 at 5:18 pm
I just thought I'd weigh in on the “what is race” discussion. Much of what Mr. Wheeler says resonates with me. There certainly is a metaphysical quality to race. You aptly pointed out that Noah's curse to the Hamites/Caananites was something that was metaphysical and not necessarily present in the DNA. There is a genetic difference between the races, but I believe that these differences permeate much deeper than mere genes. Race has a spiritual/metaphysical quality as well as a biological one.
I do have a few concerns though about the idea that race is entirely a linguistic category. It's very true as you say that the Bible usually talks about races/nations in terms of language. Nehemiah as we all know well associated lingual confusion with racial national loss of identity. Language also has a very biological/physical basis. It has been demonstrated that differences in language are related to differences in how the races perceive the world around them. These perceptions can be and have been measured in brain scans on the physical level. So while language certainly has a metaphysical nature that reflects man's soul, it also has a biological basis.
I think that in our present crisis it would be best not to define race solely in linguistic terms. Too many people of discernably different races speak English in America today. Carolina Man pointed out the peril that modern France is in because it believed it impart “Frenchness” to the North Africans it colonized by teaching them to speak French.
I also am not sure I agree with the idea that it is wrong for the different nations of Europe to intermarry. I think that your concern Mr. Wheeler is well-founded. I would be dismayed if Europe were to become a pan-Caucausian mass, rather than remain distinct nations. However I'm not sure that this has happened historically. All peoples are somewhat “mixed” to a certain degree. The modern English nationallity is a combination of the Celtic Britons, Germanic Anglo-Saxons, Frech Normans, as well as some Scandinavian influence. I'm German, and am very aware of how many different peoples are incorporated into the German identity. The Germans are comprised of the Japhetic Saxons as well as the semitic Assyrians from where the terms “German” comes from. The migration of the Assyrians out of the Near East to central/northern Europe brought many nations that they subdued out with them (including possibly, though this is speculative, many from the northern kingdom of Israel. This would help explain why there are traits found in northern Europeans that are mentioned among biblical characters such as David being ruddy/reddish in complection.) “Middle-Easterners” are also somewhat of a mix in that they derive from Japhetic Persian/Iranians, Semitic Arabs, as well as Hamitic north Africans. I'm not trying to nullify the existence of race based upon the the idea that “we're all mixed somehow”, but merely trying to point out that race has a meaning that transcends individual nations and languages.
I do think that language is a good way to identify racial characteristics though. As I said before language reflects worldview. The Indo-European languages reflect a profound and amazing understanding of the world, which is why Western/white/Indo-European literature is so fascinating to me. Indo-European language also influenced East Asia through the Hindi tongue. On the other hand dark Africans have some silly clicking sounds that they make.
I hope that this post isn't too long, just thought I'd share my thoughts. Thanks.
January 2nd, 2007 at 7:19 pm
“Here is the Oxford English dictionary meaning of Materialism:. . .”
Hey, Wheeler, don't you remember your own words?
“First, Winston Smith, you let ungodly men teach you?”
Wheeler, you let ungodly men teach you? Don't you know that the most productive contributor to the OED was a convicted murderer who spent most of his life in an institution for the criminally insane? He contributed to the OED over a period of years from his confinement in prison after he shot an innocent man in cold blood! The man he murdered had a wife and I think two sons! But, your teacher murdered him! You're being taught by an insane convicted murderer! That's your teacher, Wheeler - an insane murderer!
“Differences of the Races is one of DNA but even of greater magnitude is the Soul. It is the Soul that carries the personality—-NOT THE BODY.”
If the DNA-containing body is so unimportant, why does God bother with it at all? why does he house our souls in our bodies? If the soul is all that matters, why doesn't God just populate Earth with body-less souls and deal with them?
Wheeler, you're a fool and you're a Gnostic. John condemned you in the first century. You're a hell-bound Gnostic. And you're a hypocrite. You're guilty, guilty, guilty of your accusation against me. By your own admission, you accept the Godless teaching the Godless people who produced the OED. Shame on you relying on the sinful OED for your definitions, instead of relying on Holy Scripture for your definitions. You're a hell-bound/Satanic/Gnostic/hypocrite. Shame, SHAME on you for being so easily led to Satanic materialism by the Godless OED! The OED is a bunch of books. Books don't matter, according to you, because books are material. Only the soul matters. Right? You've said so! But you rely on material books for your salvation, books that were produced by an insane convicted murderer! You are a hell-bound/materialist/Satanic/Gnostic/hypocrite.
By the way, we've been called Nazis by better people than you. Can't you please try to come up with something a little more original?
(You make this so much fun!)
January 2nd, 2007 at 8:18 pm
This school teacher, Dr. Winston McCuen sounds like he's been reading Little Geneva. You can see the Columbia, SC television station's complete interview with him here.
http://wm.wltx.gannett.edgestreams.net/news/may06/05112006_mccuenraw_wltx.wmv
The reporter is, of course, a total tool. He sounds like a good man. I wish I was hiring for a school. It's hard to find brainwash-free “educators”. I hope he can find somewhere where he's appreciated, so he can support his family.
January 2nd, 2007 at 8:52 pm
Wow, Winchester, VA is my hometown!
This kind of article always appears every ten years.
Hispanics and yuppies are already taken it over.
January 2nd, 2007 at 9:24 pm
Language has been used by God ever since Babel as a tool of separation, but the decree to separate is much older, as is God's plan for multiformity. Still, Dave is correct that there is a genetic component to language. At the micro level, the things that comprise a people are not always easy to notice, because we take them for granted. It goes far beyond skin color, of course. At the macro level, it's easy to see what's happening. God orders all of it according to his good pleasure. He makes some people compatible and others incompatible, ans still others he allows to be destroyed or alienated through their disobedience. (Kind of like how the churches have become more irrelevant than ever as a result of their lust for relevance.)
Wheeler uses the word “race” for ethnicity, and in the proper context, that makes sense. I used to do it all the time. But it only confuses the issue when discussing miscegenation. The Bible allows for marriage between ethnicities of close relation, but it's not always preferable or ideal. God desired distinct tribes, but there was legitimate marriage between tribes (associated with a loss of inheritance). Likewise, it would be ideal if the French could remain French and the Germans German and the English English, etc. For most of human history, this was bound to happen. But the “races” of Europe have a common, compatible lineage, as Dave says. A casual survey of American history shows very clearly which peoples are compatible and which are incompatible. It's still very easy to see today. Just look at a demographic map of the country, and notice how the colors refuse to mix.
As Rushdoony said, there will invariably be a loss of religion where this rule is broken. More than likely, it will be due to libertarian tendencies. For instance, I was listening to NPR this evening (enemy research), and a single mother was complaining because China has made it too hard to adopt babies now, so she is turning to Vietnam. Everything she said was disturbing, but one thing in particular: she said her goal is to be a parent. In other words, her goal is to be a parent regardless of all other considerations, which is why colored children are just as good as White children. She has no connection whatsoever to her people. Her people are just people who live around her. She has no sense of her own history, and therefore she has no stake in her future. This is incredibly sad, but it's all too frequent, even in the churches. It reminds me of those whose goal is to get married. If that's all there is to it, it's a frighteningly bad goal. Marriage is never about just two people. There are extended families involved, and children. Marriage is a curse if entered selfishly.
Is anybody else getting sound on the clip Hesperian posted? I'd love to hear it, but I can't hear it, eh, what?
January 2nd, 2007 at 10:04 pm
Yes, I got sound, and the pleasure of hearing a real, rational, honest man.
I wish he taught at my school!
God bless,
Laurel
January 3rd, 2007 at 2:16 am
Odd, it works for me when I click on it. If you can't get it to work, try going to this story and clicking on the link to the right of the text which says, “WEB EXCLUSIVE - J.R. Berry's extended interview with Winston McCuen”.
http://www.wltx.com/news/storySpecial.aspx?storyid=37795
Just to correct myself, I meant to say that Dr. McCuen sounds like a good man, not the reporter.
January 3rd, 2007 at 2:57 pm
I didn't git any sound either, Harry. I'm using Winamp and Firefox2…
Thanks, Laurel for the onelook.com link…
Thanks, Harry, it's taking me forever to read all your articles… :)
Another top-notch issue/article/post… What do we call it?
January 3rd, 2007 at 9:05 pm
Me too - Winamp and F2. But I couldn't get sound in IE either. I'll try it on my other computer. A highly-paid professional journalist such as myself is always prepared for such adversity.
January 3rd, 2007 at 9:41 pm
I use an intel chip iMac with OS 10.4.8. I am currently using Camino (a mozilla product) with Flip4Mac plug-in to play .wmv files, which worked very well at letting me play the video with sound.
It was an awesome interview, McCuen is a man to be reckoned with.
God bless,
Laurel
January 3rd, 2007 at 9:56 pm
It's a windows video file (.wmv).
January 4th, 2007 at 12:15 am
I just watched the interview Hesperian provided. It was refreshing to hear a real man talk. The “reporter” that interviewed him was a caricature of a human while being so obviously proud of his coiffed appearance and attitudes. Don't these PC Commissars realize they are unintentional self-parodies? His jew-masters surely patted him on the head when he got back to the studio. The robot didn't hear a thing Mr. McCuen said. It only kept saying “yes but you said blacks are inferior”, “yes but you said blacks are inferior”, ad naseum in its NPR-like faux objectivity. “I'm not trying to punish you” the robot said. Maybe you're not dumb-ass but have you ever heard of the ADL and the SPLC? Also notice the reporter didn't answer McCuen's final question.
Somehow, in spite of the vapid-PC questions, McCuen shone; very eloquent and intelligent. But the contrast was so stark and was a clarion reminder of the degeneracy of that which passes for mainstream.
I pray that one day in the not too distant future our people can watch archival footage of interviews like that and marvel at which one of the participants was considered progressive and which evil by the standards of our time.
I hope not but that fine man will probably soon be looking for work. He's clearly unqualified to insure no child is left behind.
January 4th, 2007 at 12:36 am
Harry,
I just read the story in the Washington Compost on some of the Imperial Government locating to more distant areas from DC in part to avoid a potential nuclear blast. Ain't that something? The agents of the very cause as to why a nuclear attack might occur are skipping town. Also they are leaving behind the Mestizo invasion they have allowed and even encouraged and now look for haven in a mostly White enclave.
If only the people who create disaster had to face it themselves… My family is getting out of this degenerating area but it won't be until 2008.
January 4th, 2007 at 12:57 am
Yes, it's amazing. The warmongers are as far out as Harrisonville, but you can still drive down 81 through the valley and find heavily-White areas - for now.
January 4th, 2007 at 1:18 am
Speaking of archival footage. I have tried a few ways to save this video, but I'm admittedly no expert on doing this. Has anyone done so, or can anyone tell me how to do it?
January 4th, 2007 at 1:54 pm
Anyone know how to reach McCuen? If he is out of work, I may know some institutions near SC that might be looking. I can provide my contact information later.
January 4th, 2007 at 10:21 pm
Wheeler, it has come to my attention that you are the “Spartan philosopher” that posted comments here:
http://www.xanga.com/Paleocrat_etc/490678782/item.html?nextdate=10925975
I just want to know if you excuse Greek pederasty in any way. You seem to equate it with manliness. You also seem to suggest that far worse than pederasty is God's command to slay His enemies in Scripture. Please tell us where you stand.
January 4th, 2007 at 11:46 pm
That interview with McCuen is several months old. Here is a more recent letter that he wrote to AR about his latest job, which ended same story. It has an email and I wrote him an email, but I received no response. He seems to be having a hard time.
http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2006/08/persecution_of.php
From: Dr. Winston McCuen (mccuen1@bellsouth.net)
To: Jared Taylor
Hello Mr. Taylor,
It's happened again! I have been booted out of yet another teaching job: this time from a government school down in Georgia, after we sold our house in SC, moved down lock, stock and barrel, and after less than three weeks at work. Also, this idiocy comes after a very arduous and costly relocation, after spending money and time to take a certification test in Latin (my subject area, aside from philosophy), and with a three week old baby coming out of $40,000 worth of intensive care.
It happened the day before yesterday 6th period. I was called out of class to the principal's office, handed a letter from the district superintendent, and asked to turn in my room keys. They are putting me under “investigation”, acting like I have somehow falsified my work history. Of course, they will not find any impropriety; but they are using this as pretext for getting me out of the school before the media picks up on the St. Joseph's Confederate flag battle and my American Renaissance posts.
Part of me is delighted to be suddenly free of that multi-racial prison pig-pen; but another part of me fears for my family. I do trust in the Lord; and I am so sick of modernity. My fellow “teachers” were, for the most part, semi-literate blithering idiots—so many hogs at the tax-consumers' trough. The black teachers and administrators, especially the so-called doctors (of education, etc.), were particularly corrupt and unimpressive. They would never make it in a real school.
God help us! Being thrown into a gulag would be a more direct, honest and forthright form of persecution. But egalitarian Marxist America is a hypocrite's heaven. As Tocqueville observed, America is a slave regime pretending to be free.
I pray that you and yours are well. Honestly, I do not now know what is to become of my family (a wife and three sons) or where we will go; but I do know that the Almighty has always shielded and provided for us. Satan and his Marxist-egalitarian minions are running free and amuck for now; but they delude themselves if they believe that a Southron man of faith, shielded and counseled by the Almighty, will be forced out from the path of the good.
My regards to you and to yours, sir,
Dr. Winston L. McCuen
Occupied Georgia
P.S. Feel free to post this on AmRen.com if you think it could help our cause, and not, for example, discourage our side and boost our enemies. My own feeling is that people need to know that such things are happening.
January 5th, 2007 at 12:50 am
That sounds very similar to the way churches get rid of Kinists. Very sad, and this is why such men often remain anonymous. In the churches we have what we call Holy Terrorists, who attempt to destroy “racists” in the name of love.
I pray that someday White men stop hating their own people and ruining heroes like McCuen.
January 5th, 2007 at 4:01 pm
Harry, your link to Kike Gellman's diatribe is worthy of study.
Consider his assertion, “American blacks do not need to understand the institution of slavery in the United States. Whites do.”
This is clearly false. Understanding comes by thinking, not by descent.
But if it did come by descent, then why wouldn't Negroes understand “slavery in the US” by analogy with slavery in Africa, which was their ultimate origin?
“The Holocaust… is a supreme challenge to Christians, who need to understand how otherwise decent people could gas and burn…”
Assuming the Holocaust took place (which is the question the so-called “deniers” are trying to establish), it is not at all a particular challenge for Christians to understand it. But if it did not take place, then one ought to deny that it took place; which brings us back to the question, right, Kike Gellman?
“If Auschwitz was merely a detention stop for a few healthy Jewish workers, then the idea that the CIA was behind 9/11 suddenly seems reasonable.”
Interesting that he didn't say “Mossad” instead of “CIA.” And why would this connection come up to begin with? Interesting.
“Holocaust denial is not about Jews, it is about the truth, and supporting and defending the truth cannot be the burden of the Jewish people alone.”
The assumption is that truth is the burden of Jewish people at all. This surely calls for some evidence.
January 5th, 2007 at 10:55 pm
Obviously you must be taunting me. I have sent two posts which in your right you have refused to post and then you taunt me? Can I respond or is this a taunt in which you won't let me respond to?
And is this Southern Virtue? To attack and not let someone respond?
January 5th, 2007 at 11:42 pm
Of course I want you to answer.
January 6th, 2007 at 1:22 am
Wheeler,
You're lucky Harry has allowed you to post for as long as he has. Most of your screeds are garbage and nonsense. The only reason we even respond to you at all is because when you start frothing at the keyboard, you get REALLY funny. You're our very own one-man freak show. Your posts are like road-kill - a big, icky mess that we can't take our eyes off of because it's so weird-looking.
How is Harry not allowing you to respond? He asked you a question and left the board open for you to answer. Of course, you've followed your usual Jew tactic of dodging the question by changing the subject and trying to make yourself out to be some sort of victim. Just answer the question, you half-wit. Don't respond to me - answer _Harry's_ question. We're all a-twitter, waiting to see how you explain your apparent belief that God's command against faggotry is worse than faggotry. (God being against sin is worse than sin? This oughtta be good.)
January 6th, 2007 at 8:59 am
I get posted on my Xanga website this from Occidentalist: I'm gonna be blunt, Wheeler: do you have a thing for little boys?
Posted 1/3/2007 6:41 PM by Occidentalist
And then, you post almost the same thing here! What is this the politics of personal destruction? Slandering is implying something that attacks the personal character of a man. This is the route of the Devil. To slander my character. If you read that link, I said, “Due to Christian teaching we would never go that far, but they did.” Homosexuality, pedrasty is a sin.
This comes from Jeremiah Bannister's website where, just as on your site, Vittgen and JW. Boothe both attacked the Greek foundation of Western Culture. Jeremiah Bannister, which I have talked to personally, is and promotes the deconstruction of Western Culture. He has it out for me since I say miscegnation is wrong. He has an Asian wife though he is a Scotsman/European. I have said nothing toward his marriage. I really couldn't care less. But I do believe that miscegnation is wrong. For this he gets mad at me.
Second, what I have noticed what Spengler has said, that Protestantism is about Judiazing the Faith. Protestantism is about deconstructing the clergy, the Indo-European character of tripartition within Christianity. Protestantism is about deconstructing the caste system also a function of the Indo-European character of tripartition; re. The English Civil War. Protestantism is very pro-Jewish and I happen to write about the evil effects they have on our culture which I recently posted and now I get this flurry of posts on sites about slandering my character.
Never in Church history nor in any of the Church Fathers is the sin of homosexuality condemned with death; simply they are expelled and only brought back thru repentence. This is Christian teaching and tradition.
Part of the Judiazing of the Faith, is Theonomy which radical Protestants want to reinstitute Jewish law, like the Islamic Sharia, upon an Indo-European Culture and Civilization.
I stand foursquare on the CONSISTENT AND TRADITIONAL teaching on this subject with the APOSTOLIC and Universal Church of both the Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches that teach the same moral standing; Homosexuality is a sin. Homosexuality is to be repented and upon that fact only readmitted into the Church.
We, as Christians, are not under Jewish Sharia Law!!! We are under the Spirit!!! Never in Christian History were homosexuals killed, only preached against. To impose the death penalty on Homosexuality is to Judiaze the Faith. No Church Father and the Church never never has instituted the Death penalty for homosexuality as far as I know.
I am a classicist. I understand Ancient Culture. All I did was try to put in the scholary take on this. I was trying to tell the truth. Truth is not found in exageration nor in deficiency. Truth is in the RIGHTFUL AND FAITHFUL representation of reality. Contrary to the exageration of the Greek haters among the Protestant Judiazers, I put pedrasty in its proper context and milieu. Xenophon and Plato condemned homosexuality and Xenophon, and the German Classicist Karl Otfried Muller both said there was none of that in Sparta! Thousands of people, writers and intellectuals have defended and upheld the Greek foundation of Western Culture and Christianity.
To then take from this and say I have “a thing for little boys” is outrageous and mind-boggling, just typical of the low and marginal minds (Francis Parker Yockey who said America is of marginal mind) that comprise Protestantism. To Slander my character and impugn my dignity? My purpose is to defend Western Culture, Western Civilization, and traditional apostolic Christianity for the two go hand in hand.
“Before you take the splinter out of my eye, try taking the log out of yours.” God Bless you.
January 6th, 2007 at 9:04 am
“Thou shalt not bear false witness”. Either of a persons charcter or a peoples character or of events of history.
Thou shalt not bear false witness. To Tell the Truth at all times.
Need I say more?
January 6th, 2007 at 7:47 pm
Relax, Wheeler. I simply asked some questions, and thank you for answering.
“To impose the death penalty on Homosexuality is to Judiaze the Faith.”
Pardon me for saying so, but you're an idiot, and I'll probably not approve most of your comments from now on just because I have a low tolerance for stupidity.
January 6th, 2007 at 10:57 pm
I hope our good natured internet assassin will approve a few more comments from Mr. Wheeler. His “logic” is all over the place, but I would still like some clarification. First, back in post 39 he referenced a German becoming French, so therefore a Jew could also become French. Now the Jew is Semitic (ignore for a moment the Khazar question). This was an attempted response to my question (post 34). Mr. Wheeler, you miss the point. A German doesn't become French any more than a Levite became a Judahite by marrying across family lines. You do indeed confuse race with ethnic subdivisions. I have never heard each of the different families of European men called different races. As you well know, there has been marriage, migration, and conquest within Europe for centuries. Are not the English called the Anglo-Saxon peoples, indicating a specific ethnicity drawn from two different yet closely related groups? Is there not much Norman blood in England? Who draws the line? You? By your reasoning, the modern tragedy of the Great War was a race war. This is exactly the line of thinking that encouraged the limeys to hate the frogs, or the frogs to hate the krauts, or everybody to hate the micks. Our differences are God-given and should be maintained, yes. I can be a Southron, an inheritor of the stock of Wales and Ireland, and not violate that by marriage to a lady of a different EUROPEAN family.
Interesting, to me anyhow, is your insistence upon Greece as the only true foundation for Western Civilisation. Are these other “races” as you call them (actually tribes) supposed to adopt the culture and thought process of another race as preferable to their own? You can't have this both ways. Did Greek philosophy contribute to Western development? Unquestionably. Is Greek history the only place we have to look for the West's roots? Absurdity. Then, you excoriate Mr. Smith (post 35) for letting ungodly men teach him, yet claim elsewhere that the Church Fathers were great because they were first Platonists! Well here is a wonderful thing. Protestants are “Judaizers” for reading the plain sense of Scripture. (I am going to go out on a limb and suggest your real problem, as a papist, is with Sola Scriptura.) However, you are not a “Greciazer” (sic) for placing the need to understand Plato as necessary to understanding the revealed Word of God. Okay then.
Finally, to the law and the testimony. Did or did not God permit marriage among the tribes of Israel? Did He not even allow marriage to other Abrahamic peoples on occasion? Was not Moses' wife Zipporah of Midian, whom Keturah bore to Abraham? Was not Aaron's wife Elisheba, daughter of Aminadab, Sister of Nashon, of the tribe of Judah? Proper Biblical marriage is always within the same RACE, not necessarily within the same TRIBE. Miscegenation is a curse on a people, but the Bible indicates that Israelites marrying Israelites is not wrong (unless God gives a specific decree). Even Semites marrying Semites is not miscegenation in every case. European Japhethites marrying European Japhethites is not miscegenation. Protestantism is not Judaizing. Popery is not the faith once delivered to the saints. Your logic is deeply flawed.
January 6th, 2007 at 11:35 pm
Exactly. In both world wars, Jews and various money interests were successful in getting Whites to think of their fellow Whites as “the other.” There was a huge media campaign to vanquish the “Hun” in WWI - an attempt to paint Germans as mongrel savages.
Well said. You have more patience than I.
January 7th, 2007 at 9:15 am
I think I need to weigh in, here. I can state that Mr. W and I are NOT on the same page, though I DO understand (to a degree) where he is coming from. As a married man, his desire is to bequeath the cilivzation that he was raised in, to his heirs. (as it my desire)
But there comes a time in this era, when the ‘deconstruct' happens, and you realize that what ‘appears' to be real, based on Western, Greco-Roman concepts that were taught, in varying degrees and with varied success, up until only the last forty years, have VANISHED- like ‘dust in teh wind,' as the song goes. And that ‘Awakening' is as traumatic, as being told that your nation is now under control of the Bolsheviks (which it is)
I sincerely believe Mr. W has not YET achieved a synthesis of his views, or been able to articulate them with a) both the fervor of the committed and b) the ability to maintain detachment, a thing I am learning in Grad School, as I get ready to finish my dissertation.
I can understand the mentality that says, Irish marry only Irish, and Germans marry only Germans. Having visited, and contemplated living in Germany, even though I speak the language, love the food and culture, and even share some elements of their er…pre-1960's politics -lol- I found that GERMANS are a WHOLE lot DIFFERENT than ‘Amurrrikans.'
I believe Mr. W. is not only dealing with the rabid calvinism of some of you gents online, but is also dealing with the fact that he has not (up till now) had to ‘deal with' the DE-construction of his worldview, which many still think exists- especially parents of college freshman!
I do not consider him a fool, anymore than I do, oh, say Vittgen. Nor is he a ‘papist'- that merely shows the low level of historical awareness between a Greek (Orthodox) and a Papal (western, rationalist, filioquist) mindset. So, in light of that comment, it is the Presbyterians who are the ‘papists' rather than the Orthodox, so great is the psychological/philosohpical split between East and West.
RationalISM is not the same thing as being rationAL, just to be clear. If Mr. W. says he does not want his Greek-heritage kids to marry non-Greeks, then understand his view as that of the ‘pater familias' in “My Big, Fat, Greek Wedding.” What's the problem with that? We used to do this AS A MATTER OF COURSE, in my older classmate's generation. Catholics worried when I was a boy, about Irish marrying Germans. That view is not that far removed!
Mr. W. is merely stating what you twenty-seomthings cannot understand, precisely becuase of your warped upbringing at the hands of educrats, and socialist race engineers. Chip away at the tribe, and then at the race, and then at the world- that's the Deicide's model since at least the Khazars converted the Hebrews to their ‘chosenite' status (YOU CANNOT AVOID MENTIONING THIS- IT IS CRITICAL to an understanding of the FALSITY of the [sic] Jewish position)
So, Mr. Wheeler is trying out his oats, and is making some VERY strange comments, I agree. BUT OVERALL, there is a smattering of truth about what he states. I think we need to listen, give him at least the Caucasoid hand of fellowship, and hope he tightens his views and articulates them with less randomness, so that we who are not as enlightened as he, can at least understand him better.
January 7th, 2007 at 11:21 am
Thank you, Carolina Man. Please know that though you wasted your time on Wheeler, the rest of us have benefitted greatly.
January 7th, 2007 at 12:12 pm
John, we all recognize the benefits of marrying “close to home.” You're not saying anything we don't already know and have not already said 10,000 times, your ridiculous protestations of our “rabid Calvinism” notwithstanding. We have repeatedly said that inter-tribal marriage was discouraged as a matter of inheritance. God wanted 12 tribes in Israel, not one. But Carolina Man is correct that it was not outlawed. In Judges 21, the tribe of Benjamin was almost wiped out, and wives were provided for them so that the tribe would endure.
I don't like to delete comments, but I can't let you and Wheeler fill these threads with your endless and often moronic diatribes. So make it short and sweet, or put it on your own blogs, and I'll link to it if it's worth linking to.
January 8th, 2007 at 12:59 am
I thought it was. and ‘rabid calvinism' was a bit of friendly back slapping. lol I think your temper is a bit short these days, Harry.